EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/001568_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Sat Oct 28 22:19:06 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA010853946; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 22:19:06 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from ix10.ix.netcom.com by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA010793941; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 22:19:01 -0700
Received: from  by ix10.ix.netcom.com (8.6.12/SMI-4.1/Netcom)
    id WAA18593; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 22:10:33 -0700
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 1995 22:10:33 -0700
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
From: [e-mail] (Elliot Bain)
Subject: Re: SUBST and WinNT - How?!?
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

You wrote:
>
>The question remains:
>
>If I'm not supposed to do the network thing, _how_ do I SUBST a drive letter
>under NT?
>
>Thanks,
>Erik Flom
>--
If you weren't an NT guru when you decided to get your system, you probably
didn't set up your system to be Lightwave friendly by having a partition that
you could give a nice network drive letter to.

If you're going to be running just a handful of nodes, I doubt you'll take much
of a performance hit by "doing the network thing". Most of the WinNT books tell
you to start being concerned with optimization when you get up to 20 nodes on a
network.

I haven't been able to reliably measure the performance hit on a 2-computer
network.

Maybe someone can give us empirical data that will show otherwise. I'd really
like to know.

Elliot Bain
--
[e-mail] (Elliot Bain) sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]